•  

Follow the monthly scan of all major neurosurgical journals with abstracts

Message from NEUROSURGIC

Please observe that

we do not have the possibilty to

add more conferences

for the moment

 
Journalscan2_210x100

Journal scan

The SILVER (Silver Impregnated Line Versus EVD Randomized Trial): A Double-Blind, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of an Intervention to Reduce the Rate of External Ventricular Drain Infection

Har Keong, Nicole Chwee MBBS, MRCS, FRCS; Bulters, Diederik Olivier FRCS; Richards, Hugh K. PhD; Farrington, Mark FRCPath; Sparrow, Owen C. FRCS; Pickard, John D. FRCS, MChir, FMedSci; Hutchinson, Peter J. FRCS (SN), PhD; Kirkpatrick, Peter J. FRCS (SN), FMedSci

Neurosurgery 71:2:394-404, 2012. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318257bebb

BACKGROUND: Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) infections associated with external ventricular drain (EVD) placement attract major consequences. Silver impregnation of catheters attempts to reduce infection. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of silver catheters against CSF infection.

METHODS: We performed a randomized, controlled trial involving 2 neurosurgical centers (June 2005 to September 2009). A total of 356 patients requiring an EVD were assessed for eligibility; 325 patients were enrolled and randomized (167 plain, 158 silver); 278 patients were analyzed (140 plain, 138 silver). The primary outcome measure was CSF infection as defined by organisms seen on Gram stain or isolated by culture. Secondary outcome measures included ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunting.

RESULTS: There was a significant difference in infection risk between the 2 study arms: 21.4% (30/140) for plain catheters vs 12.3% (17/138) for silver catheters (P = .0427; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.015-3.713). Patients who had an EVD infection had more than double the risk of requiring a VP shunt compared with patients without an EVD infection (45.7% [21/46] vs 19.7% [45/229], respectively, P = .0002; 95% CI: 1.766-6.682). There was also a significant difference in VP shunt risk with infection: plain (55.2%; 16/29) vs the silver arm (29.4%; 5/17); P = .0244 (95% CI: 1.144-11.695). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that infection risk was increased by duration of EVD placement (odds ratio: 1.160), spontaneous intracranial hemorrhage (odds ratio 4.958) and decreased by silver catheters (odds ratio: 0.423).

CONCLUSION: The study provides Class I evidence that silver-impregnated catheters reduce CSF infection.

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write commentWrite Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
You are here: