•  

Follow the monthly scan of all major neurosurgical journals with abstracts

Message from NEUROSURGIC

Please observe that

we do not have the possibilty to

add more conferences

for the moment

 
Journalscan2_210x100

Journal scan

Craniotomy vs. craniectomy for posterior fossa tumors: a prospective study to evaluate complications after surgery

Legnani FG, Saladino A, Casali C, Vetrano IG, Varisco M, Mattei L, Prada F, Perin A, Mangraviti A, Solero CL, Dimeco F

Acta Neurochirurgica 155:12:2281-2286, 2013.

 

Background

Posterior fossa surgery traditionally implies permanent bone removal. Although suboccipital craniectomy offers an excellent exposure, it could lead to complications. Thus, some authors proposed craniotomy as a valuable alternative to craniectomy. In the present study we compare post-operative complications after craniotomy or craniectomy for posterior fossa surgery.

 

Methods

We prospectively collected data for a consecutive series of patients who underwent either posterior fossa craniotomy or craniectomy for tumor resection. We divided patients into two groups based on the surgical procedure performed and safety, complication rates and length of hospitalization were analyzed. Craniotomies were performed with Control-Depth-Attachment® drill and chisel, while we did craniectomies with perforator and rongeurs.

 

Results

One-hundred-fifty-two patients were included in the study (craniotomy n = 100, craniectomy n = 52). We detected no dural damage after bone removal in both groups. The total complication rate related to the technique itself was 7 % for the craniotomy group and 32.6 % for the craniectomy group (<0.0001). Pseudomeningocele occurred in 4 % vs. 19.2 % (p = 0.0009), CSF leak in 2 % vs. 11.5 % (p = 0.006) and wound infection in 1 % vs. 1.9 % (p = 0.33), respectively. Post-operative hydrocephalus, a multi-factorial complication which could affect our results, was also calculated and occurred in 4 % of the craniotomy vs. 9.6 % of the craniectomy group (p = 0.08). The mean length of in-hospital stay was 9.3 days for the craniotomy group and 11.8 days for the craniectomy group (p = 0.10).

 

Conclusions

The present study suggests that fashioning a suboccipital craniotomy is as effective and safe as performing a craniectomy; both procedures showed similar results in preserving dural integrity, while post-operative complications were fewer when a suboccipital craniotomy was performed.

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write commentWrite Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy
You are here: